On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:55:37AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 5/10/12 9:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On tor, 2012-05-10 at 10:44 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> The big take-away is that the release notes are mostly for blame and > >> to designate a go-to person for feature problems, not for giving > >> credit, > > > > Then reviewers should be removed. > > I disagree. We're trying to get more reviewers, and encourage them to > do more reviewing. Giving credit is a big part of that.
OK, we are officially now "all over the map" on this! I did favor reviewers over committers for the purpose of encouragement. I am fine with anything that has the same or fewer names than we have now. I don't think anyone is arguing for more names, so at least we have a direction. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
