On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> Yeah, an enum would be nicer than an additional GUC. I kinda keep forgetting >> that we have those. Though to bikeshed, the GUC should probably be just >> called >> 'zero_pages' and take the values 'never', 'missing', 'unreadable' ;-) > > Sounds reasonable to me ..
It seems like it would be nicer to have a setting that somehow makes the system disregard errors and soldier on rather than actively destroying your data. Not that I have an exact design in mind, but zero_damaged_pages is a really fast way to destroy your data. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
