Hi, On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 13:22 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> > wrote: > > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:46:28PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> On tor, 2012-05-03 at 15:47 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> > Peter, where are we on this? > >> > >> I hadn't received any clear feedback, but if no one objects, I can > >> commit it. > > > > I think there were enough people that wanted some kind of control in > > this area. I did give you feedback on the patch. > > Yes, there were significantly more votes for reverting this than > keeping it. So we at least need to have a setting.
Can we do something about this before beta2 is bundled? I would like it to be reverted though, rather than having a setting. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
