Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs writes: >> On 31 May 2012 15:00, Tom Lane wrote: >>> If we want to finish the beta cycle in a reasonable time period >>> and get back to actual development, we have to refrain from >>> adding more possibly-destabilizing development work to 9.2. And >>> that is what this is. > >> In what way is it possibly destabilising? > > I'm prepared to believe that it only affects performance, but it > could be destabilizing to that. It needs proper review and testing, > and the next CF is the right environment for that to happen. +1 This is not a bug fix or even a fix for a performance regression. The train has left the station; the next one will be along shortly. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
