On 28 June 2012 19:55, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: >> You think it will confuse users less if we start telling them to use >> something that we have a very long history of telling them not to use? > > I don't buy this line of reasoning at all. If we're going to rename > the GUC, it should be for accuracy, not PR value. If we start > renaming something every time we improve it, we're going to go nuts. > We improved lots of things in 9.2; they didn't all get renamed.
That is a false equivalence, and you know it. Who said anything about PR value? I'm concerned with not confusing users. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
