> > Well, PITR without log archiving could be alternative to > > pg_dump/pg_restore, but I agreed that it's not the big > > feature to worry about. > > Seems like a pointless "feature" to me. A pg_dump dump serves just > as well to capture a snapshot --- in fact better, since it's likely > smaller, definitely more portable, amenable to selective restore, etc.
But pg_restore probably will take longer time than copy data files back and re-apply log. > I think we should design the PITR dump to do a good job for PITR, > not a poor job of both PITR and pg_dump. As I already said - agreed -:) Vadim ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
