Sergey Koposov <kopo...@ast.cam.ac.uk> writes:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>>> Sounds less good and we'd need reasonable proof it actually did
>>>> anything useful without being dangerous.
>>> Doing an initial unlocked test speeds things up another 2.69 fold (on
>>> top of 3.55 for your patch) for me, with 1GB of shared buffers. That
>>> seems like it should be worthwhile.
>>> How do we go about getting reasonable proof that it is safe?
>> That's enough for me.
Say what? That's a performance result and proves not a damn thing about
safety.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
