On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Joshua Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > If we decide to do June, then PR will be minimal because I was assuming I had > another 7 weeks to prepare it. Not that that should be the deciding factor > (it would be great to get out an early release and get it out of the way) but > it should be taken into consideration.
Well, so far, enthusiasm for getting a release out sooner than the fall seems pretty limited. Barring an uptick in enthusiasm, I think you're going to get your 7 weeks. Personally, I like getting releases out the door sooner, because then people can start using the features sooner. And that's the whole point, isn't it? But with no PR and no installers it won't be much of a "release", so I think we have to wait. We might want to try to start putting together some dates for beta3 and/or rc1, though, even if they're a bit further out, so that the people who have to do work around that can know what dates they're trying to hit. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
