On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> This is copied from the old documentation. It used to say "It is not >> necessary to be concerned about the amount of time elapsed between >> pg_start_backup and the start of the actual backup, nor between the >> end of the backup and pg_stop_backup". >> >> And the whole idea was to simplify the text at the beginning ;) > > Oh I see, not your patch to fix then. I just quick read the diff, as you > can see. > >> This is copied exactly from what it is today. I'm sure it can be >> approved, but it's not the goal of this patch. Let's not let >> perfection get in the way of improvement... > > Same. > >> It does, it's under "standalone hot backups". The second to last part >> of the patch. > > Perfect then. > > Sorry for the noise, regards,
np, thanks for checking. Applied. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
