On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: > Let me push the pgsql_fdw in core from different perspective. > > Right now, FDW is a feature that will take many enhancement in > the near future like join-pushdown, writable APIs and so on. > If we would not have a FDW extension in core that communicate > with actual RDBMS, instead of flat files, it makes our development > efforts more complex. Please assume a scenario people alwats > tries to submit two patches; one for the core, and the other for > a particular out-of-tree extension.
yeah. plus, it's nice to have a very high quality fdw implementation in core for others to crib from. I have no objection -- I just took a convenient opportunity to hijack the thread for some hand-wavy ideas about an extension repository. :-). merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
