On 20.06.2012 11:34, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 20 June 2012 16:23, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
It's only needed for multi-master replication, where the same table can be
updated from multiple nodes. Just leave that out for now. There's plenty of
functionality and issues left even without that.
Huh? Multi-master replication is what is being built here and many
people want that.
Sure, but presumably you're going to implement master-slave first, and
build multi-master on top of that. What I'm saying is that we can leave
out the origin-id for now, since we don't have agreement on it, and
revisit it after master-slave replication is working.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
