2012/6/20 Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Marti Raudsepp <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> (I do believe that using the v9.2.0beta marker is >>> *better*, because then it sorts properly. But likely not enough much >>> better to be inconsistent with previous versions) >> >> Good point. Maybe that's a reason to change the versioning scheme and >> stick with "9.2.0betaX" everywhere. Including calling the final >> release "9.2.0" instead of simply "9.2"? > > That might actually be a good idea. We can't really change the way we > named the betas, but it's not too late to consider naming the actual > release as 9.2.0...
May be a symlink could be created just do fit the same pattern that other versions do and keeps the actual links (for beta) working. I'm using the same pattern in `pgvm` [1] and it is failing to fetch beta versions :( [1] https://github.com/guedes/pgvm/blob/master/include/sites regards -- Dickson S. Guedes mail/xmpp: [email protected] - skype: guediz http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
