On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Dickson S. Guedes <lis...@guedesoft.net> wrote: > 2012/6/20 Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net>: >> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Marti Raudsepp <ma...@juffo.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> >>> wrote: >>>> (I do believe that using the v9.2.0beta marker is >>>> *better*, because then it sorts properly. But likely not enough much >>>> better to be inconsistent with previous versions) >>> >>> Good point. Maybe that's a reason to change the versioning scheme and >>> stick with "9.2.0betaX" everywhere. Including calling the final >>> release "9.2.0" instead of simply "9.2"? >> >> That might actually be a good idea. We can't really change the way we >> named the betas, but it's not too late to consider naming the actual >> release as 9.2.0... > > > May be a symlink could be created just do fit the same pattern that other > versions do and keeps the actual links (for beta) working.
That we can do - in fact, done. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
