On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hmm. That was actually a gloss I added on existing code to try to >> convince myself that it was safe; I don't think that the changes I >> made make that any more or less safe than it was before. > > Right, sorry. I thought there was some strength reduction going on > there as well. > > Thanks for the various explanations, they address my concerns. I see > that v2 applies over v1. > > I've verified performance improvements using 8 cores with my proposed > pgbench -P benchmark, with a scale that fits in shared_buffers. > It brings it most of the way, but not quite, up to the btree performance. > > > I've marked this as ready for committer.
Thanks for the review; committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
