On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 6/26/12 2:13 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >>> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jun 26 15:49:59 -0400 2012: >>>> Robert, all: >>>> >>>> Last I checked, we had a reasonably acceptable patch to use mostly Posix >>>> Shared mem with a very small sysv ram partition. Is there anything >>>> keeping this from going into 9.3? It would eliminate a major >>>> configuration headache for our users. >>> >>> I don't think that patch was all that reasonable. It needed work, and >>> in any case it needs a rebase because it was pretty old. >> >> Yep, agreed. >> >> I'd like to get this fixed too, but it hasn't made it up to the top of >> my list of things to worry about. > > Was there a post-AgentM version of the patch, which incorporated the > small SySV RAM partition? I'm not finding it.
To my knowledge, no. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
