Josh Berkus <> writes:
>> Which three patches didn't get any review?

> Or to be more specific: I'm in favor of closing out everything which has
> had some review.  I think the three patches without any review should be
> dealt with case-by-case.

Well, I might be wrong, but the ones that don't show any activity in the
CF app are

tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples

Trim trailing NULL columns


(Note: some of the individual patches in the "logical replication" herd
haven't been given individual reviews, but certainly that patchset as a
whole has gotten its fair share of time and more.)

None of the three above seem to me to be blocking further work,
so I don't have a hard time with punting them to September.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to