Marko Kreen <mark...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm starting to look at this patch now. I think we could drop the
>> PQgetRowData() API: it complicates matters for little gain that I can
>> see. The argument for it was to avoid the cost of creating a PGresult
>> per row, but we're already going to pay the cost of creating a
>> PGresult in order to return the PGRES_SINGLE_TUPLE status.
> No. Please look again, it is supposed to be called instead of PGgetResult().
Mm. I still think we should drop it, because it's still a dangerous API
that's not necessary for the principal benefit of this feature.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
