Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Yes, it seems to have done just that. The comment for > ForwardFsyncRequest is a few bricks short of a load too: > ... > Line 2 seems to have been mechanically changed from "background > writer" to "checkpointer", but of course it should still say > "background writer" in this case.
Yeah, found that one already (it's probably my fault). Will see about fixing the stats in a separate patch. I just wanted to know if the issue had been dealt with in some non-obvious fashion. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers