On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Heikki Linnakangas < heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 13.07.2012 02:00, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Heikki Linnakangas< >> heikki.linnakangas@**enterprisedb.com<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com>> >> wrote: >> >> Thanks. Can you do something about TrickFunctionCall2, please? ( >>> http://archives.postgresql.****org/message-id/4FE2C968.** >>> 2010...@enterprisedb.com<http:**//archives.postgresql.org/** >>> message-id/4FE2C968.2010503@**enterprisedb.com<http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4fe2c968.2010...@enterprisedb.com> >>> >) >>> >>> A separate patch to refactor that in the existing gist opclass would >>> probably be best. >>> >> >> Done. There are separate patch for get rid of TrickFunctionCall2 and >> version of SP-GiST for ranges based on that patch. >> > > Committed the get-rid-of-TrickFunctionCall2 patch. I also changed one call > in range_gist_same(), which was not using TrickFunctionCall2 but was > nevertheless doing the same thing in spirit. > Good, thanks! ------ With best regards, Alexander Korotkov.
