On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > On 07/19/2012 01:04 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> >> I did a backport of temp_file_limit feature to 9.1, but when we tested >> this patch, we found very restristrictive limit to 2GB. >> >> 2GB is nonsense, because this is session limit of temp files, and >> these files should be longer than 2GB. > > > I haven't read the patch but... don't all 32bit platforms have a 2GB limit > (by default)?
I don't think so. LFS got done in the mid-90s, which is long enough ago for people to start forgetting about it. Are there any supported platforms that didn't adopt LFS? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_file_support -- When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?" -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
