On 07/20/2012 01:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of vie jul 20 13:15:12 -0400 2012:
On 07/19/2012 09:54 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Meanwhile, I would like to remove the prepared_transactions test from
the main isolation schedule, and add a new Make target which runs that
test explicitly. Is there any objection to that?
Here's the patch for that.
Looks reasonable. I'd like to have an "include" directive in regress
files so that we don't have to repeat the whole set in the second file,
but please don't let that wishlist item to stop you from committing this
Are you planning to have one of your animals run the prepared xacts
Possibly - I'm tossing up in my mind the best way to do that. (Hacking
the script on a particular client would be the wrong way.)
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: