Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of vie jul 20 13:15:12 -0400 2012: >>> Meanwhile, I would like to remove the prepared_transactions test from >>> the main isolation schedule, and add a new Make target which runs that >>> test explicitly. Is there any objection to that?
> Looks reasonable. I'd like to have an "include" directive in regress > files so that we don't have to repeat the whole set in the second file, > but please don't let that wishlist item to stop you from committing this > patch. I'm not thrilled with replicating the test-list file either. But it is not necessary: look at the way the "bigtest" target is defined in the main regression makefile. You can just add some more test names on the command line, to be done in addition to what's in the schedule file. I think we should do it that way here too. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers