Mark, > Looking at the docs (section 25.2.6 paragraph 6) leads one to believe > that downstream standbys can continue to receive and process wal merely > by reconnecting after the cascading standby is promoted - but this does > not seem to be the case (indeed the same paragraph notes that timelines > now no longer match). It looks to me like the downstream guys all need > to be rebuilt - or am I missing something?
Per discussion on this list (search for "remastering"), 9.2 still won't allow standbies to point to a new master unless you are doing file-based replication. To date, I seem to be the only one convinced that this is an actual deficiency ... -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
