On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:50:07 -0700 Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> > > Yeah, I think there's more people that agree with this use-case > > than you seem to think.. That said, I appreciate that it's not a > > trivial thing to support cleanly. > > Not trivial, no, but not major either. Really what needs to happen is > for the timeline change record to get transmitted over the WAL stream. > > Hmmm. You know, I bet I could get stream-only remastering working in > an unsafe way just by disabling the timeline checks. Time to test ... > Isn't that, what recovery_target_timeline in the recovery.conf already does? It switches to the next timeline after a master migration. See http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/recovery-target-settings.html for further information. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
