On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:38:09AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 16.08.2012 17:49, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >>> On 16.08.2012 17:36, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>>> In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to > >>>> "unimportant". > >>> > >>> FWIW, I don't think these changes were an improvement. I find > >>> "not important" more readable in those sentences. > > +1 > > >> Really? All of them? > > > > Yes.. Perhaps "not important" just feels better to me in general > > than "unimportant". > > Yeah, it's probably subjective, but for me "unimportant" has > negative, dismissive overtones, while "not important" does not. > Sort of like the way "unpleasant" has a different meaning than "not > pleasant".
OK, thanks for the feedback. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
