Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I found that code of gistchoose doesn't follow it's logic. Idea of
>> gistchoose is that first column penalty is more important than penalty of
>> second column. If we meet same penalty values of first column then we choose
>> minimal penalty value of second column among them.
> Nice catch. Thanks for the patch, which I have now committed.
Should we backpatch that?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
