On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Alexander Korotkov > <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I found that code of gistchoose doesn't follow it's logic. Idea of > > gistchoose is that first column penalty is more important than penalty of > > second column. If we meet same penalty values of first column then we > choose > > minimal penalty value of second column among them. > > Nice catch. Thanks for the patch, which I have now committed. But > since these functions were very short on useful comments, I added > some. Hopefully they're even right, but let me know if you think > otherwise, or have any ideas for further improvement. Thanks! Comments looks good for me. ------ With best regards, Alexander Korotkov.
