Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Sunday, August 26, 2012 06:10:02 PM Andres Freund wrote: >> On Saturday, August 25, 2012 06:38:09 AM Tom Lane wrote: >>> Surely that's breaking perl's expectations, to more or less the same >>> degree they're breaking ours?
>> In the referenced bug they agree that this is the way forward. > As nobody has any better ideas here is a patch doing that: OK. Do we want to commit this now, or wait till after 9.2.0? My feeling is it's probably okay to include in 9.2.0, but I can see that somebody might want to argue not to. Any objections out there? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers