On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On mån, 2012-07-02 at 01:10 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >> > But I think that part is lacking in functionality: AFAICT it's >> > hardcoded to only handle host, port, user and password. What about >> > other connection parameters, likely passed to pg_basebackup through >> > the environment in that case? isn't that quite likely to break the >> > server later? >> >> What about something like PQconninfo which returns the connection >> string value established at connection? >> >> > Maybe the proper way around that is to provide the ability for >> > pg_basebackup to take a full connection string, just like we allow >> > psql to do? >> >> +1 >> > I think both of these would be necessary to make this work smoothly. > > You also need to take into account situations like when pg_basebackup > found a server with the help of PG* environment variables that might no > longer be set when the server tries to start recovery. So you need > something like PQconninfo.
Zoltan, are you planning to work on the things discussed in this thread? I notice the patch is sitting with "waiting on author" in the CF app - so the second question is that if you are doing that, do you think it will be done within the scope of the current CF? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers