On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <z...@cybertec.at> wrote: > Hi, > > 2012-10-03 10:25 keltezéssel, Magnus Hagander írta: >> >> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> >>> On mĺn, 2012-07-02 at 01:10 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >>>>> >>>>> But I think that part is lacking in functionality: AFAICT it's >>>>> hardcoded to only handle host, port, user and password. What about >>>>> other connection parameters, likely passed to pg_basebackup through >>>>> the environment in that case? isn't that quite likely to break the >>>>> server later? >>>> >>>> What about something like PQconninfo which returns the connection >>>> string value established at connection? >>>> >>>>> Maybe the proper way around that is to provide the ability for >>>>> pg_basebackup to take a full connection string, just like we allow >>>>> psql to do? >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>> I think both of these would be necessary to make this work smoothly. >>> >>> You also need to take into account situations like when pg_basebackup >>> found a server with the help of PG* environment variables that might no >>> longer be set when the server tries to start recovery. So you need >>> something like PQconninfo. >> >> Zoltan, >> >> are you planning to work on the things discussed in this thread? I >> notice the patch is sitting with "waiting on author" in the CF app - >> so the second question is that if you are doing that, do you think it >> will be done within the scope of the current CF? > > > yes, I am on it so it can be done in this CF.
Great, thanks! -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
