On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Robert Haas escribió: >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Guillaume Lelarge >> <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: >> > Any comments on this? >> >> I'm not sure I'd want to back-patch this, since it is a behavior >> change, but I do think it's probably a good idea to change it for 9.3. > > Hm, but the bug is said to happen only in 9.2, so if we don't backpatch > we would leave 9.2 alone exhibiting this behavior.
Oh, yeah. I missed that. But then shouldn't we start by identifying which commit broke it before we decide on a fix? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
