On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > -Patch- -tps@-c1- -tps@-c2- -tps@-c8- -WAL@-c8- > HEAD,-F80 816 1644 6528 1821 MiB > xlogscale,-F80 824 1643 6551 1826 MiB > xlogscale+lz,-F80 717 1466 5924 1137 MiB > xlogscale+lz,-F100 753 1508 5948 1548 MiB
Ouch. I've been pretty excited by this patch, but I don't think we want to take an "optimization" that produces a double-digit hit at 1 client and doesn't gain even at 8 clients. I'm surprised this is costing that much, though. It doesn't seem like it should. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
