Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I gave this a look. I think it needs to be revised by somebody with a
> better understanding of scanner (flex) than me, but I didn't like the
> changes in psqlscan.l at all; the new <xvl> pattern is too unlike the
> rest of the surrounding patterns, and furthermore it has been placed
> within the block that says it mirrors the backend scanner, when it
> obviously has no equivalent there.
> I assume there's a better way to do this. Hints would be appreciated.
Personally I saw no reason for this patch to touch psqlscan.l in the
first place. Commands such as \set just scan variable names with
psql_scan_slash_option(OT_NORMAL); why shouldn't this act the same?
Moreover, the proposed lexer rules are flat out *wrong*, in that they
insist on the target variable names being {identifier}s, a restriction
not imposed by \set.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
