On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 20:44 +0100, Markus Wanner wrote:
> As described before in this thread, I think we might be able to do
> without the "has checksum"-bit, as yet another simplification. But I
> don't object to adding it, either.

I see. For a first patch, I guess that's OK. Might as well make it as
simple as possible. We probably need to decide what to do there before
9.3 is released though.

        Jeff Davis

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to