On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 11/22/12 6:44 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> I'm thinking it might be a better idea to just have PG_CONNINFO_NORMAL >> and PG_CONNINFO_PASSWORD (which still make sense to separate), > > What is the use case for separating them?
Getting a connection string that doesn't contain sensitive information like a password. In order to show it in a dialog box, for example. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
