On 11/27/12 4:20 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> On 11/22/12 6:44 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> I'm thinking it might be a better idea to just have PG_CONNINFO_NORMAL >>> and PG_CONNINFO_PASSWORD (which still make sense to separate), >> >> What is the use case for separating them? > > Getting a connection string that doesn't contain sensitive information > like a password. In order to show it in a dialog box, for example.
There is already the PQconninfoOption.dispchar field for this purpose. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
