On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 08:59:00AM -0500, Phil Sorber wrote: > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Phil Sorber <p...@omniti.com> wrote: > >> > >> Something I was just thinking about while testing this again. I > >> mentioned the issue before about someone meaning to put -v and putting > >> -V instead and it being a potential source of problems. What about > >> making verbose the default and removing -v and adding -q to make it > >> quiet? This would also match other tools behavior. I want to get this > >> wrapped up and I am fine with it as is, but just wanted to ask what > >> others thought. > > > > Bruce mentionned that pg_isready could be used directly by pg_ctl -w. > > Default as being non-verbose would make sense. What are the other tools you > > are thinking about? Some utilities in core? > > I think Bruce meant that PQPing() is used by pg_ctl -w, not that he > would use pg_isready.
Right. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
