On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Phil Sorber <p...@omniti.com> wrote: >> >> Something I was just thinking about while testing this again. I >> mentioned the issue before about someone meaning to put -v and putting >> -V instead and it being a potential source of problems. What about >> making verbose the default and removing -v and adding -q to make it >> quiet? This would also match other tools behavior. I want to get this >> wrapped up and I am fine with it as is, but just wanted to ask what >> others thought. > > Bruce mentionned that pg_isready could be used directly by pg_ctl -w. > Default as being non-verbose would make sense. What are the other tools you > are thinking about? Some utilities in core?
I think Bruce meant that PQPing() is used by pg_ctl -w, not that he would use pg_isready. I was just thinking that if someone is going to use it in a script adding -q won't be a big deal. If someone wants to use it by hand adding -v could become cumbersome. > > Except if you change the default behavior, let's change this patch status as > ready to committer. > > Thanks, > > -- > Michael Paquier > http://michael.otacoo.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
