=?iso-8859-15?q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <ced...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Le lundi 17 décembre 2012 17:42:04, Tom Lane a écrit : >> Well, it's behaving as documented, but what this means is we need to be >> very wary of what contexts we can use .SECONDARY in. I'd just as soon >> try to avoid using it at all --- my example with hand-edited gram.c >> points out that even rather short dependency chains can have unexpected >> misbehaviors if the intermediate files are marked .SECONDARY.
> "touch gram.c" then "make" will build again the affected files. Yes ... but still with the modified contents of gram.c, so this doesn't solve the problem I described. I want make to regenerate the file in question, not (only) its derived files. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers