On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan.deola...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>
> I probably did not mean increasing that to beyond 64-bit. OTOH I
> wondered if we would ever want to steal a few bits from the LSN field,
> given the numbers you just put out. But it was more of a question than
> objection.
>
BTW, now that XLogRecPtr is uint64, can't we change the pd_lsn field
to use the same type ? At least the following comment in bufpage.h
looks outdated or at the minimum needs some explanation as why LSN in
the page header needs to split into two 32-bit values.
123 /* for historical reasons, the LSN is stored as two 32-bit values. */
124 typedef struct
125 {
126 uint32 xlogid; /* high bits */
127 uint32 xrecoff; /* low bits */
128 } PageXLogRecPtr;
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
