On 21 December 2012 14:09, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Joshua Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> As ever, we spent much energy on debating backwards compatibility >>> rather than just solving the problem it posed, which is fairly easy >>> to >>> solve. >> >> Well, IIRC, the debate was primarily of *your* making. Almost everyone else >> on the thread was fine with the original patch, and it was nearly done for >> 9.2 before you stepped in. I can't find anyone else on that thread who >> thought that backwards compatibility was more important than fixing the API.
Then you're forgetting the thread. If you reread it you will find I was not alone. > +1. Let's JFDI. Agreed, lets get on with solving the problem rather than continuing a debate that could have been avoided, and can stop any time people choose to let it. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
