On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Joshua Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> As ever, we spent much energy on debating backwards compatibility >> rather than just solving the problem it posed, which is fairly easy >> to >> solve. > > Well, IIRC, the debate was primarily of *your* making. Almost everyone else > on the thread was fine with the original patch, and it was nearly done for > 9.2 before you stepped in. I can't find anyone else on that thread who > thought that backwards compatibility was more important than fixing the API.
+1. Let's JFDI. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
