On Monday, December 24, 2012 7:58 PM Kevin Grittner wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > Not really sure about the 100s of columns use case. > > > > But showing gain in useful places in these more common cases wins > > my vote. > > > > Thanks for testing. Barring objections, will commit. > > Do we have any results on just a plain, old stock pgbench run, with > the default table definitions? > > That would be a reassuring complement to the other tests.
Sever Configuration: The database cluster will be initialized with locales COLLATE: C CTYPE: C MESSAGES: en_US.UTF-8 MONETARY: en_US.UTF-8 NUMERIC: en_US.UTF-8 TIME: en_US.UTF-8 shared_buffers = 1GB checkpoint_segments = 255 checkpoint_timeout = 15min pgbench: transaction type: TPC-B (sort of) scaling factor: 75 query mode: simple number of clients: 8 number of threads: 8 duration: 600 s Performance: Average of 3 runs of pgbench in tps 9.3devel | with trailing null patch ----------+-------------------------- 578.9872 | 573.4980 With Regards, Amit Kapila. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
