Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > Is that what everyone else wants? If that is all, let's do it and close > the item.
What Simon is proposing is quite clear and not what you pasted, if I'm reading that correctly: On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 03:13:59PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > From all of the above, I think its worth doing this > * allowing recovery.conf to be in a different directory > * make recovery config parameters into GUCs > * no other changes to way things currently work I happen to like this proposal, +1 from me. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
