* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Having just constraint_schema and constraint_name feels horribly wrong > > as the definition of a constraint also includes a pg_class oid. > > but then TABLE_NAME and TABLE_SCHEMA will be defined.
How are you going to look up the constraint? Using constraint_schema,
table_name, and constraint_name? Or table_schema, table_name and
constraint_name? When do you use constraint_schema instead of
table_schema?
None of those options is exactly clear or understandable...
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
