On 29 December 2012 21:24, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > can we remove CONSTRAINT_NAME from this patch? Minimally TABLE_SCHEMA, > TABLE_NAME and COLUMN_NAME works as expected. > > CONSTRAINT_NAME can be implemented after constraints refactoring
This patch is almost completely pointless without a CONSTRAINT_NAME field. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
