On 1/3/13 12:30 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> Any particular reason? It goes pretty tightly together with >> pg_receivexlog, which is why I'd prefer putting it alongside that one. >> But if you have a good argument against it, I can change my mind :) > > Mostly that it seems like a hack, and I suspect we may come up with a > better way to do this in the future.
It does seem like a hack. Couldn't this be implemented with a backend switch instead? Also, as a small practical matter, since this is a server-side program (since it's being used as archive_command), we shouldn't put it into the pg_basebackup directory, because that would blur the lines about what to install where, in particular for the translations. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
