On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 1/3/13 3:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> It's true, as we've often >> said here, that leveraging the OS facilities means that we get the >> benefit of improving OS facilities "for free" - but it also means that >> we never exceed what the OS facilities are able to provide. > > And that should be the deciding factor, shouldn't it? Clearly, the OS > timestamps do not satisfy the requirements of tracking database object > creation times.
Yes, I think so. But I am not entirely sold on tracking the creation time of every SQL object. It might be all right, but what about catalog bloat? I am on board for databases, and for tables, at any rate. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
