Tom Lane wrote: > The reason I bring this up is that if we are changing the internal > representation of arrays, we could add type OID and perhaps typmod to > the array header, thus making an array value interpretable without any > outside info. Then you could actually do something interesting with > a function taking anyarraytype.
This sounds very cool. I'd vote for that. Joe ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
