On 17 January 2013 18:32, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 11/04/2012 07:22 PM, Qi Huang wrote: >> Dear hackers Sorry for not replying the patch review. I didn't see the >> review until recently as my mail box is full of Postgres mails and I didn't >> notice the one for me, my mail box configuration problem. I am still >> kind of busy with my university final year project. I shall not have time to >> work on updating the patch until this semester finishes which is December. I >> will work on then. Thanks. >> Best RegardsHuang Qi VictorComputer Science of National University of >> Singapore > > Did you ever do the update of the patch?
We aren't just waiting for a rebase, we're waiting for Hitoshi's comments to be addressed. I would add to them by saying I am very uncomfortable with the idea of allowing a TABLESAMPLE clause on an UPDATE or a DELETE. If you really want that you can use a sub-select. Plus the patch contains zero documentation. So I can't see this going anywhere for 9.3. I've moved it to CF1 of 9.4 marked Waiting on Author -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
